SCHOLAR MAP / GLOBAL, BUT NOT FALSELY COMPLETE

An open research community, not a closed school roster

The current verifiable sample contains 75 researchers across English-, French-, German-, Italian-, Spanish-, Portuguese-, Chinese-, Japanese-, and Korean-language contexts. It is not a global census but an extensible map with explicit inclusion criteria.

Inclusion baseline: monograph, sustained work across years, explicit reconstruction or critique, or an influential new concept—at least two criteria.
30—50operational estimate for sustained direct research
50—80estimated core Deleuzian film-philosophy community
55+conservative verifiable sample in the source review

These are bounded scoping-review estimates, not precise global totals. Citation counts, one-off terminology, or database hits do not automatically establish research depth.

A
SEVEN OPEN DEBATES

Disagreement constitutes the field

Do not first ask who is closest to Deleuze. Ask which problem each interpretation changes, what it sacrifices, and what it opens.

D1

Is 1945 a rupture or a model?

Postwar Europe is a crucial constellation, not the sole birthplace of the time-image.

D2

Replacement or coexistence?

The time-image reverses the subordination of time to movement without abolishing the movement-image; local shifts can occur within one film.

D3

How can the field de-centre Europe?

Adding countries is insufficient; world cinemas must be allowed to modify the taxonomy itself.

D4

Taxonomy or generator?

Fixed labels invite mere example-hunting; an open taxonomy requires new concepts to transform existing relations and explain across cases.

D5

Does the digital require a Cinema 3?

The neuro-image, no-time-image, and interface theories test the boundary, but no third regime has achieved consensus.

D6

Is temporal rupture automatically political?

No. Non-linearity can serve nostalgia, trauma markets, control, or paralysis; ask who may see, who must wait, and whose past is preserved.

D7

How do we avoid over-Deleuzing?

Test at least four layers—sensory-motor relation, actual/virtual circuit, audio-visual connection, and regime of truth—instead of labelling slow shots.

B
PEOPLE / WORKS / PROPOSITIONS

Researcher index

Filter by system, history, body, digital, death, and Chinese-language research. Affiliation is not nationality, and studied region is not author location.

75 verifiable researchers

29Italy / Portugal
Death, negativity & time

Marco Grosoli

Co-edited the Death-Images issue, placing life, death, history, and post-1985 cinema within an open time-image research agenda.

  • Death-Images special issue
30Portugal
Death, negativity & time

Vasco Baptista Marques

Co-edited the Death-Images issue, advancing intersections among the time-image, disappearance, material images, and contemporary cinema.

  • Death-Images special issue
34China
Chinese-language research

汪民安 / Wang Min’an

Highlights the spatial problem of the time-image in Chinese lectures: any, heterogeneous, and multiple spaces undo the natural unity of action and space.

  • 德勒兹:一个新型的电影放映员
35United States
Body, affect & senses

Steven Shaviro

Challenges language- and representation-centred film theory through the cinematic body, intensity, and passive feeling, anticipating affective and post-cinematic turns.

  • The Cinematic Body
  • Post Cinematic Affect
36Hungary
History, politics & world cinemas

András Bálint Kovács

Connects the history of modern film style with time, narration, and Deleuzian modernity and is a recurring contributor to the central edited collections.

  • Screening Modernism
  • The Brain Is the Screen
37United States
History, politics & world cinemas

Angelo Restivo

Approaches Deleuzian film philosophy through space, globalization, and national cinema; part of the verifiable core edited-volume sample.

  • The Cinema of Economic Miracles
  • Afterimages
38United States
Field-building & interdisciplinary

Dorothea Olkowski

Brings work on difference, perception, and philosophical aesthetics into the Cinema books as an important early interdisciplinary voice.

  • The Brain Is the Screen
39United States
Field-building & interdisciplinary

Dudley Andrew

Situates Deleuze within film-theory history, the Bazinian tradition, and world cinema, helping locate his place in cinema studies.

  • The Brain Is the Screen
40France
System & semiotics

François Zourabichvili

Provides rigorous philosophical grounding through work on event, literality, and Deleuzian concept creation.

  • Deleuze: A Philosophy of the Event
41Italy / United States
Body, affect & senses

Giuliana Bruno

Extends cinematic experience through space, travel, architecture, and affective mapping within the embodied turn organized by Afterimages.

  • Atlas of Emotion
  • Afterimages
42United States
Field-building & interdisciplinary

Gregg Lambert

Approaches cinema through Deleuze’s image of thought, literature, and philosophical expression, contributing to cross-media dialogue in the core collections.

  • The Non-Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze
  • The Brain Is the Screen
43Australia
Field-building & interdisciplinary

Ian Buchanan

Connects Deleuze–Guattari studies, cultural studies, and film analysis as an organizer and contributor in the English-language field.

  • Deleuze and the Contemporary World
  • Deleuze and Film
44United States
History, politics & world cinemas

James K. Chandler

Places historicity, time, and cinematic thought within a longer trajectory from Romanticism to modern culture.

  • The Brain Is the Screen
45France
System & semiotics

Jean-Clet Martin

Approaches Deleuzian cinema through folds, worlds, and multiplicities, representing the encounter of Francophone philosophy and film studies.

  • The Brain Is the Screen
46United States
Field-building & interdisciplinary

John Rajchman

Contributes work on Deleuze in modern thought, art, and architecture to the early formation of the cinema–brain–thought field.

  • The Deleuze Connections
  • The Brain Is the Screen
47France
System & semiotics

Marie-Claire Ropars-Wuilleumier

Studies writing, montage, and Blanchot-inflected thought in audio-visual relations, a key point of entry from Francophone film theory.

  • The Brain Is the Screen
48Cyprus / United Kingdom
Digital, interface & post-cinema

Markos Hadjioannou

Studies digital cinema, materiality, and modes of image existence, contributing to the turn from the time-image toward digital ontology.

  • From Light to Byte
  • Afterimages
49United States
Field-building & interdisciplinary

Martin Schwab

Participates in the foundational English-language edited discussion of Deleuzian film philosophy, thought, and audiovisual form.

  • The Brain Is the Screen
50United States
Body, affect & senses

Melinda Szaloky

Approaches Deleuze through affect, gender, embodiment, and film form, extending the experiential dimension of the original taxonomy.

  • Afterimages
51United States
System & semiotics

Peter Canning

Contributes to the foundational Brain Is the Screen discussion through cinema, time, and philosophical concept creation.

  • The Brain Is the Screen
52France
Field-building & interdisciplinary

Raymond Bellour

Develops the space between images across cinema, photography, video, and installation, a key reference for intermedial time and spectatorship.

  • Between-the-Images
  • Afterimages
53Turkey / United Kingdom
Body, affect & senses

Serazer Pekerman

Uses gender, space, and Deleuzian film concepts in the central edited collections, extending embodied and political analysis.

  • Deleuze and Film
54United States
Field-building & interdisciplinary

Tom Conley

A recurring contributor across core collections, linking maps, space, writing, and Deleuzian film philosophy.

  • The Brain Is the Screen
  • Afterimages
  • Deleuze and Film
55France / Brazil
Field-building & interdisciplinary

Éric Alliez

Connects Deleuzian philosophy with aesthetics, war, and contemporary art, grounding political and visual-cultural extensions of film philosophy.

  • The Brain-Eye
  • Afterimages
56Brazil
History, politics & world cinemas

Jorge Vasconcellos

Represents sustained Lusophone work connecting Deleuzian film philosophy with education, thought, and Latin American moving images.

  • Deleuze e o cinema
60France
System & semiotics

Suzanne Hême de Lacotte

Offers an early Francophone account of how Deleuze turns cinema, movement, and time into philosophical problems across the two Cinema books.

  • Deleuze: philosophie et cinéma
Authoritative entry
68Australia
System & semiotics

Roger Dawkins

Derives a method of film analysis from Deleuze’s transformation of structuralism and extends relational, semiotic, and differentiating structures into platform images.

  • Gilles Deleuze’s Structuralist Cinema-World
Authoritative entry
72Japan
Field-building & interdisciplinary

Tatsuya Higaki

Connects philosophy of life, moving images, and East Asian Deleuze communities through research projects, regional networks, and close-reading courses on Cinema.

  • ドゥルーズの『シネマ』読解からみる哲学と映像
Authoritative entry
73Japan
System & semiotics

Tatsuya Kimura

Offers an early Japanese-language account of the image’s monism/dualism and of the overall structure of the Cinema books.

  • ジル・ドゥルーズの映画論
  • ドゥルーズ『シネマ』の全体像
Authoritative entry
74Japan
System & semiotics

Kosaku Tozawa

Differentiates layers of croyance in the Cinema books, clarifying narrative belief, relation to the world, and the ethics of modern cinema.

  • ジル・ドゥルーズ『シネマ』における Croyance 概念の層構造
Authoritative entry