FROM ACTION TO TIME / ENTER DELEUZE THROUGH THE IMAGE

When seeing no longer leads to action, how does time appear directly?

In the movement-image, the sensory-motor schema connects perception, affection, and action. When this link enters crisis, some characters cease to be primarily agents and become seers: they see and hear what no adequate response can exhaust. But this crisis is only a negative condition of the time-image; it does not make time appear automatically. Deleuze then distinguishes the larger circuits of recollection-images and dreams, the crystal-image in which actual and virtual remain distinct yet indiscernible, and direct time-signs such as sheets of past and peaks of present. This page follows these related but non-equivalent paths.

Concept branches: movement-image [perception / affection / action] · crisis conditions [loosening sensory-motor link / pure optical and sound situations / seer] · direct time [crystal / sheets of past / peaks of present / temporal series]
01

Deleuze primary text

The term or proposition is directly locatable in Deleuze; the page layout is drawn by the atlas.

02

Named scholarly interpretation

A systematic interpretation by a named scholar with a locatable source; the atlas arranges the relations without presenting them as Deleuze's own words.

03

Cross-text comparison

A reading across the Cinema books, Bergson, philosophy of difference, psychoanalysis, or other Deleuze–Guattari texts.

04

Atlas analysis

A research tool proposed by the atlas from primary texts, scholarship, and shot evidence; open to further testing and revision.

A
WHEN ACTION NO LONGER SUFFICES / 行动何时不再充分

Characters keep acting, but action is no longer adequate to the situation

Across Cinema 1 and Cinema 2, movement does not disappear. What enters crisis is the sensory-motor schema that extends sights and sounds into an action adequate to the situation. In certain modern films, characters cease to be primarily agents and become seers. Deleuze speaks of a direct time-image only when movement becomes subordinate to time.

  1. 01Deleuze primary text

    Matter as the aggregate of images

    image / matière

    Begin with a universe of images in which subjects and viewpoints emerge.

    Cinema 1, chapters 1 and 4
  2. 02Deleuze primary text

    Perception-image

    image-perception

    A centre of indetermination selects and subtracts from the aggregate of images.

    Cinema 1, chapter 5
  3. 03Deleuze primary text

    Affection-image

    image-affection

    The body experiences itself between received movement and a response not yet carried out.

    Cinema 1, chapters 6–7
  4. 04Deleuze primary text

    Action-image

    image-action

    Action and situation determine one another in the large form S→A→S′ and the small form A→S→A′, sustaining an extensible sensory-motor circuit.

    Cinema 1, chapters 9–10
  5. 05Deleuze primary text

    Crisis of the action-image

    crise de l’image-action

    A loosened sensory-motor link shows only that the old action circuit has failed. A time-image also requires evidence that time now organises movement and the connection between shots.

    Cinema 1, chapter 12; Cinema 2, chapter 1
  6. 06Deleuze primary text

    Pure optical / sound situation

    situation optique et sonore pure

    Seeing and hearing are no longer exhausted by action; the agent becomes a seer.

    Cinema 2, chapters 1–2
  7. 07Deleuze primary text

    Direct time-image

    image-temps directe

    Time is no longer inferred from movement and instead organizes movement, editing, sound, and image.

    Cinema 2, chapters 3–10
B
HOW TIME TAKES FORM / 时间如何显形

Time is no longer represented indirectly through movement: crystals and time-signs give time an image of its own

Recollection-images and dreams enlarge the actual–virtual circuit, yet do not by themselves constitute a direct image of time. The crystal contracts the circuit to a minimum, where actual and virtual remain distinct yet indiscernible; sheets of past, peaks of present, and temporal series then give different forms of direct time. See Cinema 2, conclusion §2, 2004 ZH-CN print 431–443 / collation PDF viewer 442–454 upper half. Section 3 begins later on the same page and belongs to the next argument. The atlas reconstructs the grouping and vertical order with reference to Deamer’s scholarly taxonomy.

01 · THRESHOLD

The optical and sound threshold beyond action

Opsign and sonsign mark pure optical or sound situations. They are thresholds toward direct time, not direct time itself. Tactisign appears locally in chapter 1; the conclusion section’s recapitulation begins with opsign and sonsign.

02 · EXPANDED CIRCUITS

Recollection and dream expand the circuit, yet mnemosigns and onirosigns remain within indirect presentation

The recapitulation places mnemosign and onirosign within an indirect presentation that is subsequently surpassed; recollection and dream mark enlarged circuits.

04 · DIRECT TIME

Time-signs branch into order and series

Sheets of past and peaks of present are two forms of temporal order; the genesign names the second kind of time-sign, temporal series.

05 · THOUGHT / READABILITY

Thought and readability as dimensions

The vertical arrangement provides a reading order; films may present several relations in different combinations.

06 · BOOK ↔ FILM

Four books push the same concept into different materials

Page ranges belong to the verified editions; links return to book relations, concept pages, and sound evidence.

Named scholarly interpretation

Sutton: afterlife of the carrier

Photography, Cinema, Memory

Returns memory from abstract content to film, file, re-editing, and access regimes.

pp. 201–226
Named scholarly interpretation

Colman: sound signs and responsibility

Deleuze and Cinema: The Film Concepts

Treats sound as a relation of delay, occlusion, and responsibility rather than atmosphere.

pp. 101–146
Named scholarly interpretation

Rushton: independent sound series

Deleuze and Lola Montès

Tests whether pure sound situations and post-cinematic apparatuses form time apart from action.

pp. 63–68, 101–118
Named scholarly interpretation

Jiang: machine eye and bearer

后人类影像

Separates camera, sensor, model, and interface while asking who bears the consequences of automated vision and sound.

pp. 331–359
Cross-text comparison

Sound evidence: from hearing to bearing

Returns the four books' relation cards to locatable segments, separating audible fact, carrier, bearer, and evidence boundary.

Sound-evidence layer for Memoria, Sound of Falling, April, Cemetery of Splendour, and The Zone of Interest
Sign relations

The conclusion explicitly places mnemosign and onirosign among surpassed signs; genesign is the second kind of time-sign, temporal series.

C
FROM SHOT TO CONCEPT / 从镜头进入概念

First ask what the shot changes; then ask which concept holds

Begin with image, sound, body, space, and editing. Then ask: where does action fail, what temporal relation becomes perceptible, and what counterexample would undo the claim? A concept is not a label attached to a film; it is created in response to a problem posed by the shot. Every use the atlas makes of a concept must return to the shot and remain open to counter-evidence.

  1. 01Atlas analysis

    Record facts first

    Describe shots, duration, movement, sound, bodies, space, and editing before naming a concept.

  2. 02Atlas analysis

    Does perception still lead naturally to adequate action?

    If S→A→S′ or A→S→A′ remains effective, movement-image may still dominate.

  3. 03Atlas analysis

    Do optical or sound situations become autonomous from action?

    First record which images or sounds are not exhausted by the character’s action; then decide whether they form opsigns or sonsigns, or still serve spatial orientation, emotional prompting, or action cues.

  4. 04Atlas analysis

    What kind of recognition circuit operates?

    Mark automatic recognition, attentive recognition, failed recollection, and dream relaxation separately.

  5. 05Atlas analysis

    Which temporal relation organizes the images?

    Distinguish crystal, sheets of past, peaks of present, and genetic series; non-linearity describes only the surface structure.

  6. 06Atlas analysis

    Does a final truth still adjudicate narration?

    Multiple viewpoints and unreliable narrators may preserve a final tribunal; determine whether adjudication itself enters metamorphosis.

  7. 07Atlas analysis

    How do cuts, sound, and image relate?

    Distinguish continuity, discontinuity effects, irrational cuts, and autonomous sound/visual series.

  8. 08Atlas analysis

    How are thought, body, and politics forced into existence?

    Test attitudes, gestus, brain-like connections, the intolerable, and a people not yet given; their image-relations provide conceptual evidence.

  9. 09Atlas analysis

    Keep a composite conclusion and counter-evidence

    Movement-image and time-image relations may coexist in one segment; conclusions record evidence strength, counter-conditions, and open questions.

Atlas shot reading

Continue viewing and reading

RELATED TEXTS

Primary texts and related scholarship

Primary pages show where a relation appears in Deleuze; scholarly reconstruction shows how Deamer organises it; cross-text links show encounters with Matter and Memory, Difference and Repetition, A Thousand Plateaus, and related texts. Return to the scene library to test whether the atlas claim crosses its material; page coordinates remain attached to each node and map entry.

The scene library contains 64 scene analyses; the 198-slide atlas offers 49 further film gateways.

Open scene evidence