Deleuze primary text
The term or proposition is directly locatable in Deleuze; the page layout is drawn by the atlas.
In the movement-image, the sensory-motor schema connects perception, affection, and action. When this link enters crisis, some characters cease to be primarily agents and become seers: they see and hear what no adequate response can exhaust. But this crisis is only a negative condition of the time-image; it does not make time appear automatically. Deleuze then distinguishes the larger circuits of recollection-images and dreams, the crystal-image in which actual and virtual remain distinct yet indiscernible, and direct time-signs such as sheets of past and peaks of present. This page follows these related but non-equivalent paths.
The term or proposition is directly locatable in Deleuze; the page layout is drawn by the atlas.
A systematic interpretation by a named scholar with a locatable source; the atlas arranges the relations without presenting them as Deleuze's own words.
A reading across the Cinema books, Bergson, philosophy of difference, psychoanalysis, or other Deleuze–Guattari texts.
A research tool proposed by the atlas from primary texts, scholarship, and shot evidence; open to further testing and revision.
Across Cinema 1 and Cinema 2, movement does not disappear. What enters crisis is the sensory-motor schema that extends sights and sounds into an action adequate to the situation. In certain modern films, characters cease to be primarily agents and become seers. Deleuze speaks of a direct time-image only when movement becomes subordinate to time.
Begin with a universe of images in which subjects and viewpoints emerge.
Cinema 1, chapters 1 and 4↗A centre of indetermination selects and subtracts from the aggregate of images.
Cinema 1, chapter 5↗The body experiences itself between received movement and a response not yet carried out.
Cinema 1, chapters 6–7↗Action and situation determine one another in the large form S→A→S′ and the small form A→S→A′, sustaining an extensible sensory-motor circuit.
Cinema 1, chapters 9–10↗A loosened sensory-motor link shows only that the old action circuit has failed. A time-image also requires evidence that time now organises movement and the connection between shots.
Cinema 1, chapter 12; Cinema 2, chapter 1↗Seeing and hearing are no longer exhausted by action; the agent becomes a seer.
Cinema 2, chapters 1–2↗Time is no longer inferred from movement and instead organizes movement, editing, sound, and image.
Cinema 2, chapters 3–10↗Recollection-images and dreams enlarge the actual–virtual circuit, yet do not by themselves constitute a direct image of time. The crystal contracts the circuit to a minimum, where actual and virtual remain distinct yet indiscernible; sheets of past, peaks of present, and temporal series then give different forms of direct time. See Cinema 2, conclusion §2, 2004 ZH-CN print 431–443 / collation PDF viewer 442–454 upper half. Section 3 begins later on the same page and belongs to the next argument. The atlas reconstructs the grouping and vertical order with reference to Deamer’s scholarly taxonomy.
Opsign and sonsign mark pure optical or sound situations. They are thresholds toward direct time, not direct time itself. Tactisign appears locally in chapter 1; the conclusion section’s recapitulation begins with opsign and sonsign.
Sign of a pure optical situation.
2004 ZH-CN ed., print 434 / PDF viewer 445↗Sign of a pure sound situation.
2004 ZH-CN ed., print 434 / PDF viewer 445↗A local chapter-one concept shown as a side branch of the conclusion chain.
2004 ZH-CN ed., print 20 / PDF viewer 31↗The recapitulation places mnemosign and onirosign within an indirect presentation that is subsequently surpassed; recollection and dream mark enlarged circuits.
An actual optical-sound image and a recollection-image form an enlarged circuit.
2004 ZH-CN ed., print 435 / PDF viewer 446↗Relaxed perception passes through increasingly enlarged circuits toward dream-images.
Chapter 3, print 85 onward / PDF 96 onward; recapitulated at print 435 / PDF 446↗The hyalosign makes direct time visible as one of its forms; the criterion is the minimal actual–virtual circuit.
Sheets of past and peaks of present are two forms of temporal order; the genesign names the second kind of time-sign, temporal series.
Coexisting sheets of past and incompossible peaks of present are two forms of the same sign of temporal order.
2004 ZH-CN ed., print 436–upper 437 / PDF viewer 447–upper 448↗Time takes the form of a series of variation, bifurcation, and becoming.
2004 ZH-CN ed., print 437 / PDF viewer 448↗The vertical arrangement provides a reading order; films may present several relations in different combinations.
Cuts, intervals, and relations to the outside undo habitual images of thought and force thinking.
2004 ZH-CN ed., print 439–441 / PDF viewer 450–452↗The image becomes a readable stratigraphy of sound, image, and invisible relations; words are one of its materials.
2004 ZH-CN ed., print 443 / PDF viewer 454↗Page ranges belong to the verified editions; links return to book relations, concept pages, and sound evidence.
Returns memory from abstract content to film, file, re-editing, and access regimes.
pp. 201–226↗Treats sound as a relation of delay, occlusion, and responsibility rather than atmosphere.
pp. 101–146↗Tests whether pure sound situations and post-cinematic apparatuses form time apart from action.
pp. 63–68, 101–118↗Separates camera, sensor, model, and interface while asking who bears the consequences of automated vision and sound.
pp. 331–359↗Returns the four books' relation cards to locatable segments, separating audible fact, carrier, bearer, and evidence boundary.
Sound-evidence layer for Memoria, Sound of Falling, April, Cemetery of Splendour, and The Zone of Interest↗The conclusion explicitly places mnemosign and onirosign among surpassed signs; genesign is the second kind of time-sign, temporal series.
Begin with image, sound, body, space, and editing. Then ask: where does action fail, what temporal relation becomes perceptible, and what counterexample would undo the claim? A concept is not a label attached to a film; it is created in response to a problem posed by the shot. Every use the atlas makes of a concept must return to the shot and remain open to counter-evidence.
Describe shots, duration, movement, sound, bodies, space, and editing before naming a concept.
If S→A→S′ or A→S→A′ remains effective, movement-image may still dominate.
↗First record which images or sounds are not exhausted by the character’s action; then decide whether they form opsigns or sonsigns, or still serve spatial orientation, emotional prompting, or action cues.
↗Mark automatic recognition, attentive recognition, failed recollection, and dream relaxation separately.
↗Distinguish crystal, sheets of past, peaks of present, and genetic series; non-linearity describes only the surface structure.
↗Multiple viewpoints and unreliable narrators may preserve a final tribunal; determine whether adjudication itself enters metamorphosis.
↗Distinguish continuity, discontinuity effects, irrational cuts, and autonomous sound/visual series.
↗Test attitudes, gestus, brain-like connections, the intolerable, and a people not yet given; their image-relations provide conceptual evidence.
↗Movement-image and time-image relations may coexist in one segment; conclusions record evidence strength, counter-conditions, and open questions.
Primary pages show where a relation appears in Deleuze; scholarly reconstruction shows how Deamer organises it; cross-text links show encounters with Matter and Memory, Difference and Repetition, A Thousand Plateaus, and related texts. Return to the scene library to test whether the atlas claim crosses its material; page coordinates remain attached to each node and map entry.
The scene library contains 64 scene analyses; the 198-slide atlas offers 49 further film gateways.
Open scene evidence