Locate the claim
Provide the stable page URL and entity ID, then copy the disputed wording or field exactly.
CORRECTIONS / CHECKABLE CLAIMS
Point to the sentence, field, or timecode
A usable correction identifies the record in question and gives another reader enough evidence to check it. A dispute between interpretations need not masquerade as a typo. A sourced disagreement can be recorded as scholarly debate.
WHAT CAN BE CORRECTED
First identify the layer at issue
Correction types include facts, bibliographic data, page or timecode locators, translation, knowledge status, relations, dead links, access status, credits, and rights information.
Name the edition, page, timecode, publication record, or stable source. A bare statement of disagreement cannot alter a factual field, but it can prompt the site to document the dispute.
COPYABLE TEMPLATE
Copy and complete
Page URL:
Entity ID:
Issue type:
Current text:
Suggested change:
Verifiable source:
Contact details (optional):The entity ID appears in the record’s editorial metadata. Contact details are used only when the evidence needs clarification.
Supply a checkable locator
Name the edition, publication data, page, timecode, or archive record. A link is an entry point; the locator identifies the evidence.
Record substantive changes
An accepted factual or interpretive change updates the record version and revision date and enters the public changelog.
Send the completed template through the existing official route
This project does not invent a separate email address or individual contact for corrections. For withdrawal, still-image, or film-source concerns, read the rights page first.