Field-building & interdisciplinary

Jakob Nilsson

雅各布·尼尔松

Distinguishes philosophy’s creation of concepts from cinema’s thinking in blocks of movement/duration, then develops the cinecept through Godard–Miéville’s audiovisual practice.

01

Major works

02

Atlas further reading: debates

Begin with how a field is organized rather than with a fixed glossary, comparing how classical taxonomy, cross-media problems, and world cinemas rewrite one another's objects.

D3

How can the field de-centre Europe?

World cinemas de-centre the field by modifying the taxonomy itself.

D4

Taxonomy or generator?

Fixed labels invite mere example-hunting; an open taxonomy requires new concepts to transform existing relations and explain across cases.

D7

How do we use Deleuze precisely?

Test four layers: sensory-motor relation, actual/virtual circuit, audio-visual connection, and regime of truth.

Compare the seven open debates
03

Atlas further reading: concepts and films

04

Sources

  1. 01
    Article or research recordOpen external record ↗
  1. 01
    Cinecepts, Deleuze, and Godard-Miéville

    Develops the cinecept as a framework for philosophy proceeding through film, video, and audiovisual media.

    Open internal source record →
  2. 02
    Deleuze, Concepts, and Ideas about Film as Philosophy

    Open peer-reviewed article distinguishing cinematic blocks of movement/duration from philosophical concept creation.

    Open internal source record →