Digital, interface & post-cinema

Patricia Pisters

Proposes the neuro-image: viewers move through brains, networked memories, and informational landscapes.

01

Major works

02

Atlas further reading: debates

Do not treat digital technology as an automatic new image-regime; test how interfaces, brain–screen relations, and irrational cuts alter the production of time.

D4

Taxonomy or generator?

Fixed labels invite mere example-hunting; an open taxonomy requires new concepts to transform existing relations and explain across cases.

D5

Does the digital require a Cinema 3?

The neuro-image, no-time-image, and interface theories test the boundary, but no third regime has achieved consensus.

D6

How does temporal rupture become political?

Test non-linearity through rights to see, the distribution of waiting, and ownership of the past; its effects can include nostalgia, trauma markets, control, or paralysis.

Compare the seven open debates
03

Atlas further reading: concepts and films

04

Sources

  1. 01
    Publisher work recordOpen external record ↗
  1. 01
    The Neuro-Image

    One of the most influential post-time-image proposals, connecting brains, networks, memory, and digital screen culture.

    Open internal source record →