Identification poster for Pour la suite du monde
IMDb identification poster · for film identification only

Pierre Perrault & Michel Brault / 皮埃尔·佩罗、米歇尔·布罗 · 1963

Pour la suite du monde

Pour la suite du monde

Reviving the beluga hunt is both action and storytelling. Filming reorganizes communal memory and produces collective utterances that prefigure a people to come.

Film details

Original title
Pour la suite du monde
Director
Pierre Perrault & Michel Brault / 皮埃尔·佩罗、米歇尔·布罗
Year
1963
Region
Canada

Film analysis: how shots organize concepts

KEY SHOTPour la suite du mondeapprox. 01:39:30—01:40:30Displayed still: 01:40:00

The group delegates one member to speak for them inside an institutional setting.

VISIBLE

Three men converse in an outdoor area of the aquarium; one occupies the position between the other two.

AUDIBLE

The exchange explicitly delegates one participant to speak for the group.

SITE ANALYSISDelegation is spoken by group members and changes who can speak in what capacity.

Bilibili at 01:40:00 Open original still ↗Official NFB English-version stream; anchor 01:40:00 verified. The displayed window locates that anchor; narrative boundaries await shot-level review.

Official NFB full film; the 01:40:00 anchor is verified and the displayed window locates it.

Bilibili · 牛仔C麦 · user-provided public repost page · verified 2026-08-13

Close reading and primary texts

TEXTDELEUZE DIRECTLY ON THIS FILM

Pour la suite du monde · 1963 · Pierre Perrault & Michel Brault / 皮埃尔·佩罗、米歇尔·布罗

Pour la suite du monde: How a ‘We’ Is Filmed into Existence

Oral memory, the beluga hunt, fabulation, and a people to come

THESIS

The film places community inside a process of becoming: memory becomes speech; speech enters budgets, tides, posts, the result of the hunt, and delegation; a collective position capable of saying ‘we’ takes form.

Cinema 2 directly treats Perrault under fabulation in chapter 6 and analyzes this film’s storytelling speech-act in chapter 8. The ten scene windows and visible and audible facts were verified scene by scene; the theoretical links are established through this site's shot-by-shot analysis.

fabulationspeech-actcommunityintercessorpeople to come
PRIMARY PASSAGES

Primary passages and argumentative function

DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT

Both communicate in the invention of a people.

DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT

a speech-act

DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT

La fabulation, c’est quoi ? C’est l’appel à son peuple.

01

SITE FILM ARGUMENT

Oral memory first restores the conditions of action

Preparation, the low-tide rule, and public mobilization form one chain: memory acquires a present tense in speech, and speech convenes those who will enact it.
Three islanders confer above the river while one holds a wooden post or tool.
00:10:00Preparing to revive the beluga hunt

Preparations for the beluga hunt begin with a riverside discussion.

Open video position
A man in a cap stands beside a building in winter, raising a hand toward his mouth.
00:15:00Low-tide knowledge is spoken back into use

The elders restate the rule that the work must follow low tide.

Open video position
A bespectacled man speaks to another man outside a wooden building.
00:20:00Announcing the project to the island

The shared project reaches islanders through face-to-face explanation.

Open video position

The riverside discussion at 00:10:00 does not display a ready-made technique. The hunt has been suspended for years; posts, tides, and divisions of labour remain dispersed across elders’ bodily memory and speech. At 00:15:00 the rule of working at low tide is spoken again, reconnecting natural rhythm to human action. By 00:20:00 the addressee expands from a few knowledgeable men to the island, and recollection becomes a public proposition that can receive a response.[8][11]

Deleuze calls this relation a word in act. Its force lies not in supplying background information but in changing the positions of speaker and addressee: those who remember become transmitters, those who hear become potential participants, and the filmmakers enter the event as intercessors rather than detached observers. Froger’s account of community adds that cinema does not simply represent an existing bond; the bond is tested and produced through filming, response, and shared obligation.[1][6][4]

RESULT

The speech-act transforms a group that preserves knowledge into a group forming around action.

COUNTERTEST

The test is whether speech changes participation, roles, and material arrangements in later images; nostalgic narration alone remains testimony.

02

SITE FILM ARGUMENT

Fabulation passes through budgets, equipment, and bodily labour

Budget calculations, the transmission of a hunter’s role, and setting posts in the tide show that story becomes a generator of action only by entering material organization.
A seated man speaks during an indoor meeting, shown in profile.
00:25:00Financing the revived hunt

The meeting translates the hunt into financing and equipment.

Open video position
A bespectacled man speaks indoors and gestures toward his chest.
00:35:00How to outwit the whale

An elder explains how a hunter must outwit the whale.

Open video position
Three people steady an upright post together, with water behind them.
00:43:56Setting posts in the tide

Deliberation, roles, and materials become shared construction in the water.

Open video position

The meeting at 00:25:00 presses the revival into unit prices, financing, and equipment. At 00:35:00 an elder uses gesture, exaggeration, and practical language to shape the role of the hunter. Between 00:43:35 and 00:44:13 islanders stand knee-deep in the tide adjusting post spacing. Together the scenes show fabulation not as an escape from reality but as the conversion of an unrealized project into relations that can be costed, taught, and coordinated.[1][11]

Cinema 2 calls the film’s storytelling speech-act a generator of action. Action has not vanished; rather, its causal chain must first be rebuilt by collective enunciation. Bogue describes Perrault and the islanders as reciprocal intercessors: Perrault needs their local knowledge and voices, while filming helps them organize memory into a present undertaking. Construction is therefore repetition with difference. An older practice returns but becomes something new within an environment composed of camera, finance, and public institutions.[1][4][8]

RESULT

Fabulation is measured by its capacity to reorganize material reality and relations of action.

COUNTERTEST

If budget, technique, and labour merely explain a settled plan, they remain action documentation; fabulation appears when the plan itself takes form through speech and filming.

03

SITE FILM ARGUMENT

Attribution of origin remains contested and unresolved

The boat narrative and workshop debate preserve the community’s production of origin stories rather than deliver a historical answer adjudicated by the film.
Several men gather on a working boat as the river moves behind them.
00:30:00On the river, the hunt becomes an origin story

The river journey unfolds alongside a story about the hunt's origin.

Open video position
Two men converse beside a furnace fire in a workshop.
01:10:00Workshop debate over the origin of the posts

The origin of the post structure remains unsettled in a workshop exchange.

Open video position

At 00:30:00 participants attribute the post-weir technique to Indigenous inhabitants before the settlers; at 01:10:00 the workshop exchange continues by asking how Indigenous people obtained the idea. Kinik records another account in the film linking the structure to settlers from Brittany and Normandy. Moussette, p. 93, places island oral tradition beside Casgrain’s objection and finds no surviving document that establishes the structure’s origin. The film establishes a conflict of attribution; it does not adjudicate the inventor.[11][7][9][10]

Freire situates Perrault within an anthropology of memory: gesture and speech are staged by the filming situation without making the participants unreal. Beaulieu adds that Perrault’s légender belongs to a specific Québécois politics and poetics that cannot be exhausted by an imported philosophical category. The film works in this tension: local speech produces community while retaining the factual boundary that speech alone cannot establish historical truth.[7][5][9]

RESULT

Fabulation makes origin a relation the community is working through, rather than a myth sealed on its behalf by the film.

COUNTERTEST

Statements about Indigenous knowledge are evidence of characters’ discourse; historical judgement requires Indigenous knowledge sources and archival research.

04

SITE FILM ARGUMENT

Shared result and delegation establish a plural speaking position

The captured result gives shared labour a visible consequence, and delegation gives an individual voice plural standing; a people appears as a traceable relation rather than a homogeneous totality.
A group gathers on rocky ground above the water.
01:30:00Gathering around the captured beluga

Islanders gather around the result of the hunt as collective labour gains a visible consequence.

Open video position
Three men converse in an outdoor area of the aquarium, with one positioned between the other two.
01:40:00Delegating a spokesman at the aquarium

The group delegates one member to speak for them inside an institutional setting.

Open video position

At 01:30:00 islanders gather around the captured beluga as it is prepared for transport; collective labour has produced a visible result. At 01:40:00, the aquarium request ‘you speak for us’ explicitly places one voice in the position of group representative. The first establishes a shared consequence; the second is the directly identifiable speech-act. Collective enunciation does not require everyone to speak at once; authorization, circulation, and consequence must remain traceable in the image.[1][11]

Deleuze’s invention of a people takes concrete form here. Kinship, local knowledge, collective labour, a national film institution, and the aquarium meet, while no single subject owns the event. Froger’s community-under-trial is equally visible: the collective gains visibility through external relations and continues to face representation, institutional dependence, and internal difference. The people to come is thus an unfinished temporal structure—already appearing in action and speech, never frozen as a final identity.[1][6][5]

RESULT

The ‘we’ is composed through call, response, collective labour, and delegation, and remains open to further participation.

COUNTERTEST

A shared result proves that collaboration has consequences; explicit delegation gives one voice traceable plural standing.

SCHOLARLY DIALOGUE

How scholarship advances the film

SCHOLARSHIP · [4]

Ronald Bogue

Bogue uses intercessors to explain the reciprocal dependence of Perrault and the islanders, situating the film within fabulation and the invention of social collectivity.

Use for this film
Connect filmmaker, participant, speech, and action, explaining why construction belongs to the fabulatory process.
Critical pressure
A people must be demonstrated through concrete reciprocal dependence rather than used as an abstract political noun.
The Concept of Fabulation
SCHOLARSHIP · [6]

Marion Froger

Froger understands cinema as a site where communal bonds are tested and produced, making incompletion a formal problem.

Use for this film
Explain why the film sustains deliberation, disagreement, institutions, and delegation rather than centring only the captured beluga.
Critical pressure
Failure, difference, and external dependence must enter analysis alongside moments of solidarity.
Le cinéma à l’épreuve de la communauté
SCHOLARSHIP · [5]

Alain Beaulieu

Beaulieu reconstructs the Québec encounter between Perrault and Deleuze and returns fabulation to the cultural politics following the Quiet Revolution.

Use for this film
Read the revived hunt as the differentiated actualization of tradition and the recovery of a suppressed capacity to imagine and speak.
Critical pressure
Perrault’s légender retains its own poetic genealogy; Deleuze’s concept enters a powerful dialogue rather than replacing it.
Gilles Deleuze au Québec
SCHOLARSHIP · [7]

Marcius Freire

Freire compares Perrault and Rouch through an anthropology of memory, stressing how real participants, gesture, speech, and filming situation compose the event.

Use for this film
Support a joint reading of disputed origins and bodily labour.
Critical pressure
The staging of the filming situation must enter the factual account; participant speech is not an unmediated natural voice.
Perrault, Rouch: slippages between ‘direct cinema/cinéma-vérité’ and ‘lived cinema’
SCHOLARSHIP · [9]

Anthony Kinik

Kinik directly analyzes the workshop origin dispute, absent Indigenous presence, and the circulation among Île-aux-Coudres, Montréal, and the New York aquarium.

Use for this film
Bound the origin narrative and place final delegation within a larger institutional geography.
Critical pressure
The formation of collective speech must be tracked together with positions excluded from it.
The Beluga Triangle: Pour la suite du monde (1962), New Quebec Cinema, and the urban/rural dialectic
LIMIT TESTS

Limits of the argument

  1. 01

    A speech-act is established by changes in who participates, how action proceeds, and who can represent the collective.

  2. 02

    Fabulation is tested through material reality: tide, finance, posts, and bodily labour determine whether the project takes form.

  3. 03

    A people to come appears as an unfinished collective position; disagreement, external institutions, and representation belong to its structure.

  4. 04

    Origin claims in the film record acts of narration; their historical truth is established separately through Indigenous knowledge and archival research.

SOURCES

References

  1. 01

    PRIMARY THEORY Gilles Deleuze, Cinema 2: The Time-Image, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta (University of Minnesota Press, 1989), ch. 6, pp. 150–153; ch. 8, pp. 221–224.

    Chapter 6, pp. 150–153; chapter 8, pp. 221–224Publisher record
    Open source
  2. 02

    PRIMARY THEORY Gilles Deleuze, Cinema 2: The Time-Image, trans. Xie Qiang, Cai Ruoming, and Ma Yue (Hunan Fine Arts Publishing House, 2004), ch. 6, pp. 237–240; ch. 8, pp. 350–354.

    Chapter 6, print pp. 237–240; chapter 8, print pp. 350–354Simplified Chinese edition: Hunan Fine Arts Publishing House, 2004
    Edition collation record
  3. 03

    PRIMARY THEORY Gilles Deleuze, “Cinema and Thought 12,” 5 February 1985, The Deleuze Seminars, Purdue University.

    Approx. 114:00, fabulation as a call to a peopleOpen audio, French transcript, and English translation
    Open source
  4. 04

    SCHOLARSHIP Ronald Bogue, “The Concept of Fabulation,” in Deleuzian Fabulation and the Scars of History (Edinburgh University Press, 2010), pp. 14–48.

    Chapter 1, pp. 14–48, especially pp. 18–19Publisher chapter; preview available · DOI 10.1515/9780748641758-003
    Open source
  5. 05

    SCHOLARSHIP Alain Beaulieu, “Gilles Deleuze au Québec,” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie 63.2 (2024): 375–396.

    pp. 375–396Peer-reviewed; Cambridge Core full-text gateway · DOI 10.1017/S0012217324000313
    Open source
  6. 06

    SCHOLARSHIP Marion Froger, Le cinéma à l’épreuve de la communauté (Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 2010).

    Open full text on OpenEdition
    Open source
  7. 07

    SCHOLARSHIP Marcius Freire, “Perrault, Rouch: slippages between ‘direct cinema/cinéma-vérité’ and ‘lived cinema’,” Significação 39.38 (2012): 27–39.

    pp. 27–39Open peer-reviewed article · DOI 10.11606/issn.2316-7114.sig.2012.71137
    Open source
  8. 08

    SCHOLARSHIP Séverine Graff, “La construction en France du cinéma direct canadien,” in Le cinéma-vérité: films et controverses (Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2014).

    Full text on OpenEdition
    Open source
  9. 09

    SCHOLARSHIP Anthony Kinik, “The Beluga Triangle: Pour la suite du monde (1962), New Quebec Cinema, and the urban/rural dialectic,” Shima 18.2 (2024): 21–32.

    pp. 21–32Open peer-reviewed article · DOI 10.21463/shima.234
    Open source
  10. 10

    SCHOLARSHIP Marcel Moussette, Fishing Methods Used in the St. Lawrence River and Gulf, Parks Canada History and Archaeology 22 (1979), p. 93.

    p. 93, oral tradition and documentary limits concerning the origin of the post weirOpen Government of Canada PDF
    Open source
  11. 11

    FILM SOURCE Michel Brault, Marcel Carrière, and Pierre Perrault, Pour la suite du monde (National Film Board of Canada, 1963), official English-subtitled version.

    Official NFB full-film stream
    Open source
Reading attribution: Atlas editorial synthesis · Sources and locators

Close-reading questions

How does the camera turn a long-interrupted hunt from memory into a shared project and give a collective a position from which to speak?

  1. 01
    How does collective narration reactivate a long-interrupted hunt as common action?
  2. 02
    Who speaks, who is convened, and who becomes the people to come?

Shots, relations, and concepts

  1. 1
    Record

    Three island men confer above the river; one handles a wooden post or tool. The hunt concerns the beluga, locally called marsouin blanc. French location dialogue discusses preparations still to be made; the official player supplies English subtitles.

    Open the scene currently used to ground this chain: Preparing to revive the beluga hunt
  2. 2
    Judge the relation

    The hunt has long been discontinued, while elders retain its techniques in memory and speech; collective deliberation reorganizes them into an executable plan. The past enters the present as practical knowledge awaiting revival, and the group retakes that time through narration.

  3. 3
    Name the concept last

    Speech act and a people to come. Only concepts whose scene relation resolves to “supports” under the current record are named here; candidates, adjacent terms, and countertests are not merged into the conclusion.

  4. 4
    Countertest

    Subsequent images show deliberation becoming roles, equipment, and shared labour.

Shots and scenes

Three islanders confer above the river while one holds a wooden post or tool.
00:10:00Preparing to revive the beluga hunt

Subsequent images show deliberation becoming roles, equipment, and shared labour.

Open viewing position ↗
A man in a cap stands beside a building in winter, raising a hand toward his mouth.
00:15:00Low-tide knowledge is spoken back into use

Later judgements of tide, placement of posts, and collective labour take up this knowledge.

Open viewing position ↗
A bespectacled man speaks to another man outside a wooden building.
00:20:00Announcing the project to the island

The sequel shows recruits, delegated roles, financing, and collective construction.

Open viewing position ↗
A seated man speaks during an indoor meeting, shown in profile.
00:25:00Financing the revived hunt

The calculation belongs to the film’s larger collective reconstruction and leads toward purchase and construction.

Open viewing position ↗
Several men gather on a working boat as the river moves behind them.
00:30:00On the river, the hunt becomes an origin story

The attribution records the islanders’ narrative position; Indigenous history requires separate independent evidence.

Open viewing position ↗
A bespectacled man speaks indoors and gestures toward his chest.
00:35:00How to outwit the whale

Later collective construction and hunting give the utterance practical force.

Open viewing position ↗
Three people steady an upright post together, with water behind them.
00:43:56Setting posts in the tide

The labour itself is action; its temporal relation comes from the full genesis from oral account to construction.

Open viewing position ↗
Two men converse beside a furnace fire in a workshop.
01:10:00Workshop debate over the origin of the posts

The scene establishes the speakers’ conjecture and memory; historical fact requires Indigenous sources and archival verification.

Open viewing position ↗
A group gathers on rocky ground above the water.
01:30:00Gathering around the captured beluga

This segment first establishes a shared result; the later explicit delegation establishes plural speaking authority.

Open viewing position ↗
Three men converse in an outdoor area of the aquarium, with one positioned between the other two.
01:40:00Delegating a spokesman at the aquarium

Delegation is spoken by group members and changes who can speak in what capacity.

Open viewing position ↗

Primary texts, scholarship, and locators

Theory coordinate: Cinema 2, Minnesota 1989, ch. 6, p. 150; ch. 8, pp. 221, 223

  1. 01
    Cinema 2: The Time-Image

    Authoritative source for the standard translation, translators, ISBN, and publication date.

    Open the atlas source record →
  1. 01
    Gilles Deleuze, Cinema 2: The Time-Image, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta (University of Minnesota Press, 1989), ch. 6, pp. 150–153; ch. 8, pp. 221–224.

    Chapter 6, pp. 150–153; chapter 8, pp. 221–224

    Open source ↗
  2. 02
    Gilles Deleuze, Cinema 2: The Time-Image, trans. Xie Qiang, Cai Ruoming, and Ma Yue (Hunan Fine Arts Publishing House, 2004), ch. 6, pp. 237–240; ch. 8, pp. 350–354.

    Chapter 6, print pp. 237–240; chapter 8, print pp. 350–354

  3. 03
    Gilles Deleuze, “Cinema and Thought 12,” 5 February 1985, The Deleuze Seminars, Purdue University.

    Approx. 114:00, fabulation as a call to a people

    Open source ↗
  4. 04
    Ronald Bogue, “The Concept of Fabulation,” in Deleuzian Fabulation and the Scars of History (Edinburgh University Press, 2010), pp. 14–48.

    Chapter 1, pp. 14–48, especially pp. 18–19

    Open source ↗
  5. 05
    Alain Beaulieu, “Gilles Deleuze au Québec,” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie 63.2 (2024): 375–396.

    pp. 375–396

    Open source ↗
  6. 06
    Marion Froger, Le cinéma à l’épreuve de la communauté (Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 2010).Open source ↗
  7. 07
    Marcius Freire, “Perrault, Rouch: slippages between ‘direct cinema/cinéma-vérité’ and ‘lived cinema’,” Significação 39.38 (2012): 27–39.

    pp. 27–39

    Open source ↗
  8. 08
    Séverine Graff, “La construction en France du cinéma direct canadien,” in Le cinéma-vérité: films et controverses (Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2014).Open source ↗
  9. 09
    Anthony Kinik, “The Beluga Triangle: Pour la suite du monde (1962), New Quebec Cinema, and the urban/rural dialectic,” Shima 18.2 (2024): 21–32.

    pp. 21–32

    Open source ↗
  10. 10
    Marcel Moussette, Fishing Methods Used in the St. Lawrence River and Gulf, Parks Canada History and Archaeology 22 (1979), p. 93.

    p. 93, oral tradition and documentary limits concerning the origin of the post weir

    Open source ↗
  11. 11
    Michel Brault, Marcel Carrière, and Pierre Perrault, Pour la suite du monde (National Film Board of Canada, 1963), official English-subtitled version.Open source ↗

This film in books and research

Gilles Deleuze : cinéma et philosophie · Atlas analysis

Pour la suite du monde

Marrati pp. 102–118 · site test

Film relation: This site makes 'belief in the world' observable as collective production: a long-interrupted beluga hunt passes from oral memory into funding, equipment, tide, stakes, ritual, and delegated speech, forming a position capable of saying 'we.'

Shot question: Which utterance changes participants, resources, roles, or authority to speak, and which labour proves that speech has not remained a myth of community?

Conclusion: Belief is not an optimistic judgment but the fabrication of a new speech-action relation within a world that offers no guarantee.

Gilles Deleuze : cinéma et philosophie · Atlas analysis

How does an utterance pass through matter and become common action?

Marrati pp. 111–118

Claim: Belief in the world is not verbal hope. Speech remakes a broken world-relation only when it changes participants, resources, roles, labour, or authority to speak.

Film relation: Riverside discussion organizes memory as a plan, explanation to islanders recruits participants, driving posts subjects the plan to tide and labour, and final delegation specifies who may speak for the collective.

Conclusion: The position capable of saying 'we' is not a completed entity predating filming; it acquires actuality through a chain of speech, resources, labour, and delegation.

Cinema 2: The Time-Image, French primary edition · Cinema 2, chapter 6Cinema 2: The Time-Image, French primary edition · Cinema 2, chapter 8

Documentary Time: Film and Phenomenology

Pour la suite du monde

Reading relation: Test documentary time through ritual reenactment, oral memory, and communal action.

Fabulation: How the Speech Act Prefigures a People to Come

Fabulation is a double becoming

Claim: Real characters become other through storytelling, while their intervention changes the filmmaker's position.

Conclusion: A character's telling, performance, or reenactment must change both the character's position and the filmmaker's structure.

Cinema 2: The Time-Image · pp. 151, 223Deleuze on Cinema · pp. 135–164Cinema 2: The Time-Image · ch. 6, p. 150; ch. 8, pp. 221, 223Fabulation, Narration and the People to Come · pp. 202–226

Fabulation: How the Speech Act Prefigures a People to Come

The speech act is evidenced by real consequences

Claim: An utterance acquires efficacy when it changes participants, resources, tasks, labour, or authority within the film.

Conclusion: For each utterance record speaker, addressee, path of circulation, and visible consequence. Changes in role, resource, labour, or authority establish the speech act.

Cinema 2: The Time-Image · ch. 6, p. 150; ch. 8, pp. 221, 223Fabulation, Narration and the People to Come · pp. 202–226

Viewing gateways and editions

  1. Verified complete Bilibili carrier: 【纪录片】为了世界的继续 Pour la suite du monde(1963)bilibili.comOpen film page ↗
    Page access
    Accessible when checked
    Version extent
    Recorded as a complete version
    Source type
    User-uploaded page

    Edition note: The image timeline matches the NFB English-language edition, accompanied by ten still-led scene analyses.

    Link checked: 2026-08-13

    Report a broken linkRaise a rights query

  2. National Film Board of Canadanfb.caOpen film page ↗
    Source type
    Institutional source

    Report a broken linkRaise a rights query