TEXT → SHOT → SCHOLARSHIP · 2026-08-13

Fabulation: How the Speech Act Prefigures a People to Come

Tracing an unfinished collective through double becoming, material consequences, and collective enunciation

RELATION MODEL

Concept relation

  1. 01Characters tell and reenact their situation
  2. 02Character and filmmaker change one another's position
  3. 03Speech alters roles, resources, and labour
  4. 04Collective enunciation prefigures a people to come
THESIS

Fabulation produces reality through storytelling. Character and filmmaker become intercessors; private experience enters politics; speech changes roles, labour, resources, and authority. These visible effects produce collective enunciation and prefigure a plural, unfinished people to come.

Cinema 2 chapters 6 and 8 directly discuss Pour la suite du monde, Moi, un noir, and Black God, White Devil. Scene timecodes, visible facts, and consequences of speech come from this atlas's shot analysis; The Hour of the Furnaces compares another starting point for political cinema.

PRIMARY PASSAGES

Primary coordinates

DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT

C’est l’appel à son peuple.

01

FACT → RELATION → TEST

Fabulation is a double becoming

Real characters become other through storytelling, while their intervention changes the filmmaker's position.
Three islanders confer above the river while one holds a wooden post or tool.
00:10:00Preparing to revive the beluga hunt

Preparations for the beluga hunt begin with a riverside discussion.

Open scene evidence
DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT

In Moi, un noir, assumed names, postsynchronized voices, and urban experience rewrite one another. Characters no longer supply material for a prior ethnography; through narration they perform and produce new subject positions, changing Rouch's authorial position through free indirect discourse.[1, pp. 156, 230][3, pp. 135–164]

ATLAS ANALYSIS

The first discussions in Pour la suite du monde transform a long-interrupted beluga hunt from elders' memory into a shared object. Perrault proposes the revival, while islanders provide knowledge, disagreement, and labour; neither side alone determines what the film will produce.[1, pp. 150–153][4, pp. 202–226]

RESULT

A character's telling, performance, or reenactment must change both the character's position and the filmmaker's structure.

COUNTERTEST

If characters merely answer fixed questions and editing extracts a prior thesis, storytelling remains information gathering.

02

FACT → RELATION → TEST

The speech act is evidenced by real consequences

An utterance acquires efficacy when it changes participants, resources, tasks, labour, or authority within the film.
Three islanders confer above the river while one holds a wooden post or tool.
00:10:00Preparing to revive the beluga hunt

Preparations for the beluga hunt begin with a riverside discussion.

Open scene evidence
Three people steady an upright post together, with water behind them.
00:43:56Setting posts in the tide

Deliberation, roles, and materials become shared construction in the water.

Open scene evidence
Three men converse in an outdoor area of the aquarium, with one positioned between the other two.
01:40:00Delegating a spokesman at the aquarium

The group delegates one member to speak for them inside an institutional setting.

Open scene evidence
ATLAS ANALYSIS

Elders speak knowledge of tides, posts, and beluga; islanders form a plan through discussion, obtain equipment through financing, and set posts in the tide. Speaker, addressee, circulation, and collective labour occupy one timeline, so speech enters a material assemblage.[1, pp. 150–153][4, pp. 202–226]

ATLAS ANALYSIS

At the aquarium, the group explicitly delegates one person to speak on its behalf. An individual voice acquires a plural source and public capacity; authority is not conferred by voice-over but produced by a traceable act within the group.[1, pp. 150–153]

RESULT

For each utterance record speaker, addressee, path of circulation, and visible consequence. Changes in role, resource, labour, or authority establish the speech act.

COUNTERTEST

Dialogue that only repeats a completed plan without changing participation or conditions of action remains explanation or record.

03

FACT → RELATION → TEST

Collective enunciation prefigures a people to come

A plural speaking position forms through disagreement, relay, response, and delegation; the people remains minor, unfinished, and future-facing.
DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT

In Black God, White Devil, myth, trance, and changing allegiance expose the people's absence. Figures move among religious leader, bandit, peasant, and myth; the collective is not completed before the film begins, and absence becomes a condition of creation.[1, pp. 225, 229]

ATLAS ANALYSIS

The montage, intertitles, pauses, and discussions of The Hour of the Furnaces directly address a revolutionary audience. This essay uses it as an atlas comparison: it begins with public address, while Perrault and Rouch film a collective speaking position taking form through speech.

RESULT

The full chain requires double becoming, real consequences, a plural speaking position, and an unfinished collective.

COUNTERTEST

When one leader represents a pre-completed, homogeneous people without internal difference, the speaking position is already closed.

COMPARATIVE TESTS

Film comparisons

DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT1963

Pour la suite du monde

Memory enters plan and labour

Storytelling, financing, setting posts, and delegation form a traceable speech-act chain.

DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT1958

Moi, un noir

Characters become through voice

Assumed names, postsynchronized voices, and urban experience produce new subject positions.

DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT1964

Black God, White Devil

The missing people as creative condition

Myth, trance, and changing allegiance keep the collective unfinished.

ATLAS ANALYSIS1968

The Hour of the Furnaces

A presupposed revolutionary addressee

Begins from an addressable people, contrasting with a speaking position generated inside the film.

SCHOLARLY DIALOGUE

How scholarship advances the problem

REFERENCES

References

  1. 01

    DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT Gilles Deleuze, Cinema 2: The Time-Image, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta (University of Minnesota Press, 1989).

    Chapter 6, pp. 150–156; chapter 8, pp. 215–230Publisher record and purchase access
  2. 02

    DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT Gilles Deleuze, Cinema and Thought seminar, Lecture 12, 5 February 1985, Purdue archive.

    Around 114:00, fabulation and the peopleOpen audio, French transcript, and English translation
  3. 03

    SCHOLARSHIP Ronald Bogue, Deleuze on Cinema (Routledge, 2003).

    Chapter 5, especially “Powers of the False” and “Rouch's Ethnofictions,” pp. 135–164Publisher record and preview
  4. 04

    SCHOLARSHIP Ronald Bogue, “Fabulation, Narration and the People to Come,” in Deleuze and Philosophy (Edinburgh University Press, 2006), pp. 202–226.

    pp. 202–226DOI and publisher chapter access · DOI 10.1515/9780748627196-016