Speech, people & world

Fabulation: How the Speech Act Prefigures a People to Come

Tracing an unfinished collective through double becoming, material consequences, and collective enunciation

RELATION MODEL

Concept relation

  1. 01Characters tell and reenact their situation
  2. 02Character and filmmaker change one another's position
  3. 03Speech alters roles, resources, and labour
  4. 04Collective enunciation prefigures a people to come
THESIS

Fabulation produces reality through storytelling. Character and filmmaker become intercessors; private experience enters politics; speech changes roles, labour, resources, and authority. These visible effects produce collective enunciation and prefigure a plural, unfinished people to come.

Cinema 2 chapters 6 and 8 directly discuss Pour la suite du monde, Moi, un noir, and Black God, White Devil. Scene timecodes, visible facts, and consequences of speech come from this atlas's shot analysis; The Hour of the Furnaces compares another starting point for political cinema.

PRIMARY PASSAGES

Primary coordinates

DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT

C’est l’appel à son peuple.

01

FACT → RELATION → TEST

Fabulation is a double becoming

Real characters become other through storytelling, while their intervention changes the filmmaker's position.
Three islanders confer above the river while one holds a wooden post or tool.
00:10:00Preparing to revive the beluga hunt

Preparations for the beluga hunt begin with a riverside discussion.

Bilibili at 00:10:00 Open scene evidence
SHOT PENDINGMoi, un noir

The query “我是黑人 让鲁什 1958” was run once (general ranking, all time, page 1) and returned neither Moi, un noir nor a verifiable key excerpt. Chronicle of a Summer and videos about Jean Rouch are different works and were not substituted.

page or search record checked 2026-08-14
DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT

In Moi, un noir, assumed names, postsynchronized voices, and urban experience rewrite one another. Characters no longer supply material for a prior ethnography; through narration they perform and produce new subject positions, changing Rouch's authorial position through free indirect discourse.[1, pp. 151, 223][3, pp. 135–164]

ATLAS ANALYSIS

The first discussions in Pour la suite du monde transform a long-interrupted beluga hunt from elders' memory into a shared object. Perrault proposes the revival, while islanders provide knowledge, disagreement, and labour; neither side alone determines what the film will produce.[1, ch. 6, p. 150; ch. 8, pp. 221, 223][4, pp. 202–226]

RESULT

A character's telling, performance, or reenactment must change both the character's position and the filmmaker's structure.

COUNTERTEST

If characters merely answer fixed questions and editing extracts a prior thesis, storytelling remains information gathering.

02

FACT → RELATION → TEST

The speech act is evidenced by real consequences

An utterance acquires efficacy when it changes participants, resources, tasks, labour, or authority within the film.
Three islanders confer above the river while one holds a wooden post or tool.
00:10:00Preparing to revive the beluga hunt

Preparations for the beluga hunt begin with a riverside discussion.

Bilibili at 00:10:00 Open scene evidence
Three people steady an upright post together, with water behind them.
00:43:56Setting posts in the tide

Deliberation, roles, and materials become shared construction in the water.

Bilibili at 00:43:56 Open scene evidence
Three men converse in an outdoor area of the aquarium, with one positioned between the other two.
01:40:00Delegating a spokesman at the aquarium

The group delegates one member to speak for them inside an institutional setting.

Bilibili at 01:40:00 Open scene evidence
ATLAS ANALYSIS

Elders speak knowledge of tides, posts, and beluga; islanders form a plan through discussion, obtain equipment through financing, and set posts in the tide. Speaker, addressee, circulation, and collective labour occupy one timeline, so speech enters a material assemblage.[1, ch. 6, p. 150; ch. 8, pp. 221, 223][4, pp. 202–226]

ATLAS ANALYSIS

At the aquarium, the group explicitly delegates one person to speak on its behalf. An individual voice acquires a plural source and public capacity; authority is not conferred by voice-over but produced by a traceable act within the group.[1, ch. 6, p. 150; ch. 8, pp. 221, 223]

RESULT

For each utterance record speaker, addressee, path of circulation, and visible consequence. Changes in role, resource, labour, or authority establish the speech act.

COUNTERTEST

Dialogue that only repeats a completed plan without changing participation or conditions of action remains explanation or record.

03

FACT → RELATION → TEST

Collective enunciation prefigures a people to come

A plural speaking position forms through disagreement, relay, response, and delegation; the people remains minor, unfinished, and future-facing.
Corisco stares frontally beneath a leather hat hung with coins, black streaks across his face, while Manuel's head enters from below01:30:00
KEY SHOTBlack God, White Devil01:29:40–01:31:00Displayed still: 01:30:00

Bandit, mythical figure, and speaker are compressed into one face while allegiance remains in motion through speech.

VISIBLE

Corisco's coin-hung hat, facial streaks, and frontal close-up bind costume, body, and mythical identity.

Manuel enters only from the lower edge, so their positions are not stabilized by balanced shot/reverse-shot.

AUDIBLE

Corisco challenges Manuel in loud, rhythmic speech closer to public performance than private conversation.

SITE ANALYSISFigures change allegiance among peasant, believer, bandit, and myth; the collective is not pre-completed, and Corisco's performative speech turns that absence into a condition of creation.

Cinema 2, chapter 8, pp. 222–223.Bilibili at 01:30:00 Open original still ↗The verbal challenge between Corisco and Manuel was frame-checked.

Complete Bilibili carrier; the shot at 单片 01:30:00 was checked frame by frame, and the still and timestamp come from the same public upload.

Bilibili · Black God, White Devil complete film · verified 2026-08-14
SHOT PENDINGMoi, un noir

The query “我是黑人 让鲁什 1958” was run once (general ranking, all time, page 1) and returned neither Moi, un noir nor a verifiable key excerpt. Chronicle of a Summer and videos about Jean Rouch are different works and were not substituted.

page or search record checked 2026-08-14
A black-and-white photograph of Che Guevara's face after death fills the frame, his open eyes directed toward the viewer第1分段 01:22:30 / Part 1 01:22:30
KEY SHOTThe Hour of the Furnaces第1分段 01:20:00–01:24:50 / Part 1 01:20:00–01:24:50Displayed still: 第1分段 01:22:30 / Part 1 01:22:30

The photograph is held for several minutes, turning projection from argument into a direct demand on the audience.

VISIBLE

The same death photograph continues to fill the screen; eyes, wounds, and facial texture are not quickly displaced by another montage item.

AUDIBLE

The extended still is supported only by continuing percussion; no character dialogue supplies the audience's conclusion.

SITE ANALYSISThe prolonged gaze of the death image and percussion turn the absent revolutionary into a direct relation of address, presupposing a revolutionary audience able to respond and continue the action.

Bilibili at 第1分段 01:22:30 / Part 1 01:22:30 Open original still ↗The extended final image of Che Guevara in part 1 was frame-checked.

Complete Bilibili carrier; the shot at 第1分段 01:22:30 was checked frame by frame, and the still and timestamp come from the same public upload.

Bilibili · The Hour of the Furnaces, part 1 · verified 2026-08-14
DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT

In Black God, White Devil, myth, trance, and changing allegiance expose the people's absence. Figures move among religious leader, bandit, peasant, and myth; the collective is not completed before the film begins, and absence becomes a condition of creation.[1, pp. 222–223]

ATLAS ANALYSIS

The montage, intertitles, pauses, and discussions of The Hour of the Furnaces directly address a revolutionary audience. This essay uses it as an atlas comparison: it begins with public address, while Perrault and Rouch film a collective speaking position taking form through speech.

RESULT

The full chain requires double becoming, real consequences, a plural speaking position, and an unfinished collective.

COUNTERTEST

When one leader represents a pre-completed, homogeneous people without internal difference, the speaking position is already closed.

04

FACT → RELATION → TEST

Minor cinema: making a collective voice inside a major language

Minor cinema is not a label for an author's identity or a small production; it is a formal operation that pushes singular experience toward collective enunciation. Stutter, borrowed names, translation, and displacement create new addressee positions inside a major language.
SHOT PENDINGMoi, un noir

The query “我是黑人 让鲁什 1958” was run once (general ranking, all time, page 1) and returned neither Moi, un noir nor a verifiable key excerpt. Chronicle of a Summer and videos about Jean Rouch are different works and were not substituted.

page or search record checked 2026-08-14
Corisco stares frontally beneath a leather hat hung with coins, black streaks across his face, while Manuel's head enters from below01:30:00
KEY SHOTBlack God, White Devil01:29:40–01:31:00Displayed still: 01:30:00

Bandit, mythical figure, and speaker are compressed into one face while allegiance remains in motion through speech.

VISIBLE

Corisco's coin-hung hat, facial streaks, and frontal close-up bind costume, body, and mythical identity.

Manuel enters only from the lower edge, so their positions are not stabilized by balanced shot/reverse-shot.

AUDIBLE

Corisco challenges Manuel in loud, rhythmic speech closer to public performance than private conversation.

SITE ANALYSISFigures change allegiance among peasant, believer, bandit, and myth; the collective is not pre-completed, and Corisco's performative speech turns that absence into a condition of creation.

Cinema 2, chapter 8, pp. 222–223.Bilibili at 01:30:00 Open original still ↗The verbal challenge between Corisco and Manuel was frame-checked.

Complete Bilibili carrier; the shot at 单片 01:30:00 was checked frame by frame, and the still and timestamp come from the same public upload.

Bilibili · Black God, White Devil complete film · verified 2026-08-14
DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT

Chapter 8 of Cinema 2 frames political cinema through a people not yet formed rather than speaking for a completed community. Minor cinema must therefore handle linguistic pressure and the absence of a people at once: it creates deviation within a major grammar and changes both speaker and addressee.[1, Chapter 8, pp. 215–224]

SCHOLARSHIP

Rodowick's account of minor cinema places fabulation, mixed language, and intercessor relations on one political chain. Borrowed names and postsynchronized voices in Moi, un noir make private life collectively audible; myth and song in Black God, White Devil keep belonging in revision; Police, Adjective exposes through translation, definition, and bureaucratic classification how language controls who may speak. None of the three can be established by the filmmaker's identity or subject label alone.[5, ‘Series and Fabulation: Minor Cinema,’ pp. 139–169]

RESULT

Map speaker, addressee, translation path, and consequence. Minor cinema becomes testable when linguistic deviation changes who can be heard and who bears the response.

COUNTERTEST

Minoritized identity, dialect, low budget, or a political slogan does not itself make minor cinema; the language operation must change the position of collective speech.

COMPARATIVE TESTS

Film comparisons

ATLAS ANALYSIS1963

Pour la suite du monde

Memory enters plan and labour

Storytelling, financing, setting posts, and delegation form a traceable speech-act chain.

Deleuze discusses this film directly here · ch. 6, p. 150; ch. 8, pp. 221, 223
Three men converse in an outdoor area of the aquarium, with one positioned between the other two.01:40:00
KEY SHOTPour la suite du mondeapprox. 01:39:30—01:40:30Displayed still: 01:40:00

The group delegates one member to speak for them inside an institutional setting.

VISIBLE

Three men converse in an outdoor area of the aquarium; one occupies the position between the other two.

AUDIBLE

The exchange explicitly delegates one participant to speak for the group.

SITE ANALYSISDelegation is spoken by group members and changes who can speak in what capacity.

Bilibili at 01:40:00 Open original still ↗Official NFB English-version stream; anchor 01:40:00 verified. The displayed window locates that anchor; narrative boundaries await shot-level review.

Official NFB full film; the 01:40:00 anchor is verified and the displayed window locates it.

Bilibili · 牛仔C麦 · user-provided public repost page · verified 2026-08-13
ATLAS ANALYSIS1958

Moi, un noir

Characters become through voice

Assumed names, postsynchronized voices, and urban experience produce new subject positions.

Deleuze discusses this film directly here · pp. 151, 223
SHOT PENDINGMoi, un noir

The query “我是黑人 让鲁什 1958” was run once (general ranking, all time, page 1) and returned neither Moi, un noir nor a verifiable key excerpt. Chronicle of a Summer and videos about Jean Rouch are different works and were not substituted.

page or search record checked 2026-08-14
ATLAS ANALYSIS1964

Black God, White Devil

The missing people as creative condition

Myth, trance, and changing allegiance keep the collective unfinished.

Deleuze discusses this film directly here · pp. 222–223
Corisco stares frontally beneath a leather hat hung with coins, black streaks across his face, while Manuel's head enters from below01:30:00
KEY SHOTBlack God, White Devil01:29:40–01:31:00Displayed still: 01:30:00

Bandit, mythical figure, and speaker are compressed into one face while allegiance remains in motion through speech.

VISIBLE

Corisco's coin-hung hat, facial streaks, and frontal close-up bind costume, body, and mythical identity.

Manuel enters only from the lower edge, so their positions are not stabilized by balanced shot/reverse-shot.

AUDIBLE

Corisco challenges Manuel in loud, rhythmic speech closer to public performance than private conversation.

SITE ANALYSISFigures change allegiance among peasant, believer, bandit, and myth; the collective is not pre-completed, and Corisco's performative speech turns that absence into a condition of creation.

Cinema 2, chapter 8, pp. 222–223.Bilibili at 01:30:00 Open original still ↗The verbal challenge between Corisco and Manuel was frame-checked.

Complete Bilibili carrier; the shot at 单片 01:30:00 was checked frame by frame, and the still and timestamp come from the same public upload.

Bilibili · Black God, White Devil complete film · verified 2026-08-14
ATLAS ANALYSIS1968

The Hour of the Furnaces

A presupposed revolutionary addressee

Begins from an addressable people, contrasting with a speaking position generated inside the film.

A black-and-white photograph of Che Guevara's face after death fills the frame, his open eyes directed toward the viewer第1分段 01:22:30 / Part 1 01:22:30
KEY SHOTThe Hour of the Furnaces第1分段 01:20:00–01:24:50 / Part 1 01:20:00–01:24:50Displayed still: 第1分段 01:22:30 / Part 1 01:22:30

The photograph is held for several minutes, turning projection from argument into a direct demand on the audience.

VISIBLE

The same death photograph continues to fill the screen; eyes, wounds, and facial texture are not quickly displaced by another montage item.

AUDIBLE

The extended still is supported only by continuing percussion; no character dialogue supplies the audience's conclusion.

SITE ANALYSISThe prolonged gaze of the death image and percussion turn the absent revolutionary into a direct relation of address, presupposing a revolutionary audience able to respond and continue the action.

Bilibili at 第1分段 01:22:30 / Part 1 01:22:30 Open original still ↗The extended final image of Che Guevara in part 1 was frame-checked.

Complete Bilibili carrier; the shot at 第1分段 01:22:30 was checked frame by frame, and the still and timestamp come from the same public upload.

Bilibili · The Hour of the Furnaces, part 1 · verified 2026-08-14
CONCEPT → FILM → SHOT

Put the claim back into more films

These films are not a list of examples but pressure tests: when the same concept meets different spaces, bodies, sounds, and narrations, which relations still hold and which must be withdrawn?

CONCEPT–FILM BRIDGE / 06

Who says ‘we’, and how does that we appear?

Return fabulation to speech, labour, dispute, and projection: a collective is not an identity present in advance but a traceable result of speech changing relations.

RETURN TO CONCEPTFabulation
CORE CASERELATION · ATLAS ANALYSISFULL-FILM GATEWAY VERIFIED
RELATION

Collective storytelling turns memory into an actionable ‘we’

The beluga hunt, interrupted for years, is spoken back through elders' bodily memory and then enters tide rules, budgets, posts, labour, and delegation. Story is not a backdrop to action; it organizes an unrealized plan into a present a community can bear.

Three men converse in an outdoor area of the aquarium, with one positioned between the other two.01:40:00
The group delegates one member to speak for them inside an institutional setting.
CONCEPT MOVE
Speech changes the positions of speaker, addressee, and material arrangement; a people gains a voice in formation.
SHOT EVIDENCE
Replay preparation, financing, post-setting, capture, and delegation in order; record when speech changes roles and subsequent action.
BOUNDARY
Nostalgic narration only proves that memory exists; fabulation must produce material consequences and new speaking positions in later images.
DELEUZE DISCUSSES THIS FILM

Cinema 2, ch. 6, p. 150; ch. 8, pp. 221, 223

LOCATORTen site scene records, including the aquarium delegation

FILM ENTRY

Moi, un noir

CORE CASERELATION · ATLAS ANALYSISCARRIER SEARCH ROUTE
RELATION

Borrowed names and post-recorded voices turn lived experience into minor speech

Participants borrow names from film characters, while post-recorded voices reorganize filmed life. Fiction does not erase reality; it lets people speak experience from another position, beginning collective enunciation through personal transformation.

CONCEPT MOVE
Participants and filmmakers become other together, giving an individual voice plural directions.
SHOT EVIDENCE
Compare street action, borrowed names, post-recorded narration, and bodily attitudes; find when fiction changes the speaker's position toward labour, city, and self.
BOUNDARY
Performance or narration alone is not fabulation; they must change who can speak, who is heard, and what speech does.
DELEUZE DISCUSSES THIS FILM

Cinema 2, ch. 6, p. 151; ch. 8, p. 223

LOCATORBorrowed names, post-recorded voices, and street performance

SCHOLARLY DIALOGUE

How scholarship advances the problem

REFERENCES

References

  1. 01

    DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT Gilles Deleuze, Cinema 2: The Time-Image, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta (University of Minnesota Press, 1989).

    Chapter 6, pp. 150–155; chapter 8, pp. 215–224Publisher record and purchase access
  2. 02

    DELEUZE PRIMARY TEXT Gilles Deleuze, Cinema and Thought seminar, Lecture 12, 5 February 1985, Purdue archive.

    Around 114:00, fabulation and the peopleOpen audio, French transcript, and English translation
  3. 03

    SCHOLARSHIP Ronald Bogue, Deleuze on Cinema (Routledge, 2003).

    Chapter 5, especially “Powers of the False” and “Rouch's Ethnofictions,” pp. 135–164Publisher record and preview
  4. 04

    SCHOLARSHIP Ronald Bogue, “Fabulation, Narration and the People to Come,” in Deleuze and Philosophy (Edinburgh University Press, 2006), pp. 202–226.

    pp. 202–226DOI and publisher chapter access · DOI 10.1515/9780748627196-016
  5. 05

    SCHOLARSHIP D. N. Rodowick, Gilles Deleuze's Time Machine (Duke University Press, 1997).

    ‘Series and Fabulation: Minor Cinema,’ pp. 139–169Publisher record and chapter locator